1. The Importance of Separating UI and Logic in Match-3 Games

When developing Match-3 games, ensuring scalability and maintainability is critical. The separation of UI (User Interface) and Logic lies at the heart of achieving these goals. This principle not only enhances the readability and modularity of your code but also empowers your team to work on distinct areas of the project independently.

Here’s why separating UI and logic is essential:

  • Scalability: As features grow, decoupled logic allows new mechanics to be added without altering the UI layer.
  • Maintainability: Debugging becomes easier when UI and logic are isolated, reducing the risk of cascading errors.
  • Testing: Unit testing game logic is much simpler when it’s not entangled with UI code.

For Match-3 games, where gameplay relies on real-time feedback and seamless interaction, this separation ensures that developers can iterate quickly without fear of breaking functionality.


2. Core Concepts: What Does Separation Entail?

In software architecture, the separation of concerns (SoC) principle advocates dividing code into distinct layers. In Match-3 games, this often translates to adopting patterns like MVC (Model-View-Controller) or MVVM (Model-View-ViewModel). Let’s break this down:

1) Model

The Model is responsible for handling the game’s core logic and state management. This includes:

  • Generating the game board.
  • Validating matches.
  • Managing tile drops and refills.

2) View

The View displays the game state to the player. This involves:

  • Rendering tiles and effects.
  • Handling animations and feedback.

3) Controller

The Controller bridges the Model and View, coordinating data flow between the two layers:

  • Receiving player input from the View.
  • Updating the Model and refreshing the View accordingly.

3. Advanced Implementation: Modular, Reusable Code Examples

Below is a more sophisticated implementation for a Match-3 game, emphasizing modularity and real-world usability.

Model: TileManager.cs (Core Logic)

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;

public class TileManager
{
    private int[,] board;
    private readonly int rows, columns;
    private readonly int matchCount = 3;

    public event Action<List<(int, int)>> OnTilesMatched;

    public TileManager(int rows, int columns)
    {
        this.rows = rows;
        this.columns = columns;
        board = new int[rows, columns];
        InitializeBoard();
    }

    private void InitializeBoard()
    {
        Random rng = new Random();
        for (int r = 0; r < rows; r++)
        {
            for (int c = 0; c < columns; c++)
            {
                board[r, c] = rng.Next(1, 6); // Random tile types (1-5).
            }
        }
    }

    public bool CheckForMatches()
    {
        List<(int, int)> matchedTiles = new List<(int, int)>();
        // Horizontal matches
        for (int r = 0; r < rows; r++)
        {
            for (int c = 0; c < columns - 2; c++)
            {
                if (board[r, c] == board[r, c + 1] && board[r, c] == board[r, c + 2])
                {
                    matchedTiles.Add((r, c));
                    matchedTiles.Add((r, c + 1));
                    matchedTiles.Add((r, c + 2));
                }
            }
        }
        // Vertical matches
        for (int c = 0; c < columns; c++)
        {
            for (int r = 0; r < rows - 2; r++)
            {
                if (board[r, c] == board[r + 1, c] && board[r, c] == board[r + 2, c])
                {
                    matchedTiles.Add((r, c));
                    matchedTiles.Add((r + 1, c));
                    matchedTiles.Add((r + 2, c));
                }
            }
        }

        if (matchedTiles.Count > 0)
        {
            OnTilesMatched?.Invoke(matchedTiles);
            return true;
        }
        return false;
    }

    public void ClearMatchedTiles(List<(int, int)> matchedTiles)
    {
        foreach (var (r, c) in matchedTiles)
        {
            board[r, c] = 0; // Clear matched tiles (0 represents empty).
        }
    }

    public void FillEmptyTiles()
    {
        Random rng = new Random();
        for (int c = 0; c < columns; c++)
        {
            for (int r = rows - 1; r >= 0; r--)
            {
                if (board[r, c] == 0)
                {
                    board[r, c] = rng.Next(1, 6); // Refill with new random tiles.
                }
            }
        }
    }

    public int[,] GetBoardState() => board;
}

View: TileView.cs (UI Layer)

using UnityEngine;

public class TileView : MonoBehaviour
{
    public GameObject tilePrefab;
    private GameObject[,] tileObjects;

    public void InitializeBoard(int[,] boardData)
    {
        int rows = boardData.GetLength(0);
        int columns = boardData.GetLength(1);
        tileObjects = new GameObject[rows, columns];

        for (int r = 0; r < rows; r++)
        {
            for (int c = 0; c < columns; c++)
            {
                GameObject tile = Instantiate(tilePrefab, new Vector3(c, -r, 0), Quaternion.identity);
                tile.name = $"Tile_{r}_{c}";
                UpdateTileVisual(tile, boardData[r, c]);
                tileObjects[r, c] = tile;
            }
        }
    }

    public void UpdateTileVisual(GameObject tile, int type)
    {
        var spriteRenderer = tile.GetComponent<SpriteRenderer>();
        spriteRenderer.color = GetColorByType(type); // Simplified for demonstration.
    }

    private Color GetColorByType(int type)
    {
        return type switch
        {
            1 => Color.red,
            2 => Color.green,
            3 => Color.blue,
            4 => Color.yellow,
            5 => Color.magenta,
            _ => Color.white
        };
    }
}

Controller: GameController.cs (Coordinator)

using UnityEngine;

public class GameController : MonoBehaviour
{
    private TileManager tileManager;
    private TileView tileView;

    private void Start()
    {
        int rows = 8, columns = 8;
        tileManager = new TileManager(rows, columns);
        tileManager.OnTilesMatched += HandleMatches;

        tileView = FindObjectOfType<TileView>();
        tileView.InitializeBoard(tileManager.GetBoardState());
    }

    private void HandleMatches(List<(int, int)> matchedTiles)
    {
        tileManager.ClearMatchedTiles(matchedTiles);
        tileManager.FillEmptyTiles();
        tileView.InitializeBoard(tileManager.GetBoardState());
    }
}

4. Strengths and Challenges of This Approach

Strengths

  1. Clear Separation: Each layer operates independently, simplifying debugging and development.
  2. Reusability: Models and Views can be swapped out or reused in other projects.
  3. Scalability: Complex mechanics like combos or special tiles can be added without affecting the UI.

Challenges

  1. Higher Initial Effort: Setting up this architecture requires more time compared to simple implementations.
  2. Communication Complexity: Inter-layer communication must be well-designed to avoid performance bottlenecks.

5. Conclusion

By separating UI and logic in Match-3 games, you ensure scalability, maintainability, and long-term success. The provided architecture and modular code offer a robust foundation for your projects, enabling you to focus on gameplay innovation without being bogged down by technical debt.

Adopting these principles might seem like extra effort initially, but the rewards in terms of cleaner, more reliable code make it an essential practice for serious game developers.

답글 남기기

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다